Digitalization of Sports Equipment in Europe: Comparing Wearable Device Use between EU and Non-EU Europe (2024)
Abstract views: 0
/ 
PDF downloads: 0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18089029Keywords:
Wearable Devices, Sports Technologies, Digitalization, Technology ManagementAbstract
This study compares the use of wearable devices (smartwatches/fitness bands) as a practical indicator of digitalization in sports equipment in the European Union (EU) and non-EU European countries. Eurostat's "Use of Internet of Things by individuals" dataset (isoc_iiot_use; indicator: I_IOT_DCS2—wearables; unit: PC_IND; ind_type: IND_TOTAL) is used for a single year, 2024, and country-level usage rates for individuals aged 16–74 are obtained. In a brief comparative analysis between the EU (EU-27, n=26) and non-EU Europe (n=7), descriptive statistics show that mean usage is 32.8% (sd=9.8; median=30.7%) in the EU and 17.6% (sd=17.5; median=13.0%) in non-EU Europe. The primary Mann–Whitney U test revealed that the difference between the groups was statistically significant (W=158, p=0.0034). The Welch t-test, reported as a robustness check, yielded a borderline result (t=2.21; sd=7.04; p=0.062). Effect sizes were high (Cliff’s δ=0.74; Hedges’ g=1.27; 95% CI 0.37–2.17). The findings indicate that, in terms of technology management, digitalization in the EU has reached a more mature level with complementary assets (connectivity infrastructure, application/service ecosystem, data governance, and regulatory framework). In non-EU Europe, due to heterogeneity, market creation and localization strategies are important.
References
Agarwal, S., & Kapoor, R. (2023). Value creation tradeoff in business ecosystems: Leveraging complementarities while managing interdependencies. Organization Science, 34(3), 1216-1242.
Armağan, C. (2024). Teknoloji Kabul ve Kullanım Birleştirilmiş Modeli 2 (Utaut2). Tüketici Davranışlarında Kullanılan Modeller: Geçmişten Günümüze Tüketici Davranışlarını Belirlemede Kullanılan Modeller, 61.
Bakare¹, S. S., Adeniyi, A. O., Akpuokwe, C. U., & Eneh⁴, N. E. (2024). Data privacy laws and compliance: a comparative review of the EU GDPR and USA regulations.
Bruno, G., Diglio, A., Piccolo, C., & Pipicelli, E. (2023). A reduced Composite Indicator for Digital Divide measurement at the regional level: An application to the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122461.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Hein, A., Weking, J., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019). Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electronic markets, 29(3), 503-518.
Hoofnagle, C. J., Van Der Sloot, B., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2019). The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it means. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(1), 65-98.
Kurt, S., & Eken, İ. (2022). Sporda giyilebilir teknolojilerin birleştirilmiş teknoloji kabul ve kullanım teorisi 2’ye (utaut-2) göre davranışsal niyetlerin incelenmesi: Nabız monitörü örneği. Intermedia International E-journal, 9(16), 77-96.
Li, R. T., Kling, S. R., Salata, M. J., Cupp, S. A., Sheehan, J., & Voos, J. E. (2016). Wearable performance devices in sports medicine. Sports health, 8(1), 74-78.
Passos, J., Lopes, S. I., Clemente, F. M., Moreira, P. M., Rico-González, M., Bezerra, P., & Rodrigues, L. P. (2021). Wearables and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies for fitness assessment: a systematic review. Sensors, 21(16), 5418.
Regulation, P. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Regulation (eu), 679(2016), 10-13.
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.
Serçek, S., & Korkmaz, M. (2023). Sporda giyilebilir teknoloji üzerine sistematik bir literatür taraması. Uluslararası Güncel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(1), 77-92.
Sevgi, H. (2021). Analysis of the digital economy and society index (DESI) through a cluster analysis. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23, 37-51.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305.
Tiryaki, İ., & Önder, L. G. (2022). Tüketicilerin akıllı giyilebilir nesnelerin kullanımına yönelik davranış niyetlerinin genişletilmiş teknoloji kabul modeli aracılığıyla incelenmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(1), 182-202.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Wang, J. (2025). Exploration of the Path of Digital Technology Empowering the Sustainable Development of Alumni Football-Based on Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, 1613339.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Holistic Health, Sports and Recreation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
